While the politician turns around upload filter and corona measures, there is also big elsewhere Clarificationnamely at the gambling regulation in force in July for all Australian federal states Exclusive Schleswig-Holstein. Already the model is in Harscher criticism. Last but not least because of the planned control model. Now the Düsseldorfer Heinrich-Heine University with a study speaks award, which predicts a threat to the entire gambling market.
User tax endangered canalization
Specifically, the study revolves around the planned Tax consolidation of 8% On all game inserts, which will be made on slot machines in the future. The study was in collaboration with the "Australian sports betting association"(DSWV), the"Australian online casino association"(DOCV) and the"Düsseldorfer Institute for Competition Economics"(DICE) created.
In this context, Prof. Dr. med. HAUCAP together with his colleagues Daniel Fritz and Dr. Susanne Thorwarth proves that the tax planned by the Ministries could lead to no channeling of the Online gambling Obtained, but these are strongly endangered on the contrary. This is mainly because in Australia one NetPielerTragsbesteuerung. instead of a gross playback taxation was planned. The taxes are therefore not spent on the profit of the casino, but on pure game turnover.
Control model Attestation of player protection?
The state ministries justify the high tax burden with player protection and explain to a test Means for gaming addiction. However, it is ignored that not only today, but also in the future many less invasive means of gambling addiction will be available. Casinos already offer a voluntary basis deposit limits, optional game specifications and make sure that minors will not give access. With the introduction of the Glüstv 2023 These, today optional measures even become a duty for casino providers.
However, taxation has a direct Negative to the payout rate out. For customers, however, it is an important key figure, as you combine a lower loss maintenance with a high payout rate. Usually, the payout quotas of machine games are between 96% and 98%. The taxation of 8% would therefore mean that the tax burden becomes higher than the current revenue, which forced the providers to correct them down.
Tax does not affect game addiction
Prof. Dr. Haucap Close Flashesthat a significant reduction of the payout ratio would reduce the incentive for a legal operation of virtual machine games and thus the Migration to the unregulated black market or at present European providers is almost sure. So that's not only the planned tax revenues would break away, but would have the exact opposite of which you actually wanted to achieve, namely to offer players a safe and regulated game environment.
Purely mathematically, the optimal tax burden of a gross player is between 15 and 20 percent. Then the tax volume was secured and the channeling can be achieved effectively. If one is from a reduction of the RTP value of 96% to 88%, but the gross player allowance tax would be 66.67%. More than twice the computational optimal amount. A possible episode: The channeling ratio falls below 50% and the destination of the Gullv can be considered failed.
Conclusion
So far, the ministries have not yet been expressed to the study and it remains to be seen whether the warning is taken seriously. Much time for changes, however, does not stay anymore, because Already in July the new contract should come into force And many providers have already changed their program and requested an official license.
